sn | HP UFT (QTP) | Selenium | Better |
1 | Licensed Tool (costly) | Open Source Tool ( no cost) | Selenium |
2 | Supports for Desktop(windows) based (like java, .net, SAP, Oracle ERP…etc) and Web based applications | only for web based applications | QTP |
3 | easy to develop the scripts as it provides built in objects, methods..etc | little complex to integrate third party tools and write programming from scratch | QTP |
4 | scripts are developed only in QTP Window | scripts are developed in different IDEs like Visual Studio, Eclipse, Netbeans | Selenium |
5 | Scripts are developed only using VBScript | Scripts are developed using JAVA, C#, Ruby, Perl, Phython,Groovy..etc | Selenium |
6 | provides object repository so that it is easy to add objects and store the properties to recognize objects | there is no object repository, all properties are written in the code only | QTP |
7 | Tool can be integrated with HP QC for test management and defect reporting | There are no tools to integrate | QTP |
8 | Very good support as we buy the license | Has to depend on forums, groups for help | QTP |
9 | very good help documents to learn and explore | no good help provided by the tool with examples and should explore from diff sources | QTP |
10 | dedicated system needed to run the scripts, cannot interrup in middle | the system used to run the script, we can perform other work and scripts are running in background | Selenium |
11 | supports mainly for IE browser and also supports for firefox and chrome | supports for all the browsers IE, FireFox, Chrome, Safari, Opera | Selenium |
12 | supports only on windows OS | supports on windows, Linux, Mac OS |
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Difference btween QTP and Selenium
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment